Popper Reference : Thornton , Stephen , 2005 : “ Karl Popper ” . In “ The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy ”
نویسنده
چکیده
Karl Popper is generally regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of science of the 20th century. He was also a social and political philosopher of considerable stature, a self-professed ‘critical-rationalist’, a dedicated opponent of all forms of scepticism, conventionalism, and relativism in science and in human affairs generally, a committed advocate and staunch defender of the ‘Open Society’, and an implacable critic of totalitarianism in all of its forms. One of the many remarkable features of Popper's thought is the scope of his intellectual influence. In the modern technological and highlyspecialised world scientists are rarely aware of the work of philosophers; it is virtually unprecedented to find them queuing up, as they have done in Popper's case, to testify to the enormously practical beneficial impact which that philosophical work has had upon their own. But notwithstanding the fact that he wrote on even the most technical matters with consummate clarity, the scope of Popper's work is such that it is commonplace by now to find that commentators tend to deal with the epistemological, scientific and social elements of his thought as if they were quite disparate and unconnected, and thus the fundamental unity of his philosophical vision and method has to a large degree been dissipated. Here we will try to trace the threads which interconnect the various elements of his philosophy, and which give it its fundamental unity.
منابع مشابه
The views of Karl Popper and Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI on a theory of rationality
Typical of some contemporary theories of rationality is the pithily formulated idea stated almost 20 years ago by Gillian Rose (1947-1995) in her autobiography: «Reason, the critical criterion, is forever without ground». One important way of understanding this statement is found in the early writings of Karl R. Popper (1902-1994). This statement expresses the conviction at the root of Popper’s...
متن کاملScience: Conjectures and Refutations
“Mr. Turnbull had predicted evil consequences, . . . and was now doing the best in his power to bring about the verification of his own prophecies.” ANTHONY TROLLOPE _____________________________ A lecture given at Peterhouse, Cambridge, in Summer 1953, as part of a course on Developments and trends in contemporary British philosophy, organized by the British Council; originally published under...
متن کاملOn the Alleged Impossibility of Inductive Probability*
Karl Popper and David Miller [1983] have argued that there is no such thing as probabilistic inductive support, as conceived of, for example, in the Bayesian theory of evidence. A little more specifically, they argue that 'all probabilistic support is purely deductive' (p. 688), and that only probabilistic countersupport (disconfirmation) could be inductive in nature. Their interesting and stri...
متن کامل“ The most philosophically of all the sciences ” : Karl Popper and physical cosmology
Problems of scientific cosmology only rarely occur in the works of Karl Popper, the famous Austrian-British philosopher. Nevertheless, it was a subject that interested him and which he occasionally commented on. What is more important, his general claim of falsifiability as a criterion that demarcates science from non-science has played a significant role in periods of the development of modern...
متن کامل